Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Thomas v. Apple
as 9:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas
Defendant:
Craig Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William N. Lucy v. Tahir Siddiq, et al
as 23-11578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHIR TAHIR SIDDIQ, FOUNTAIN CF WARDEN, MRS. KRAUEL, R.N. D.O.N. and others
Bruni v. Sheehan et al
as 9:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carl Bruni
Defendant:
Kathy M. Sheehan, Dixon, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Tunecore et al
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Marcus M. Allen
Defendant:
Tunecore, Dennis Ladegaillerie, Distro Kid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FREDERICK v. BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
SYLVANIA FREDERICK III and SYLVANIA FREDERICK, III
Defendant:
BATHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BLVD MANNER, HAMPTON PLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Dillihunt v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Victoria T. Dillihunt
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10124
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv13040
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
WEBSTER v. APPLE et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY WEBSTER
Defendant:
MIKE APPLE, K9 DOG and D. HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
