Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,795
Armstrong v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner: Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent: William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Stanley Johnson
Defendant: Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. KIRKLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: BUSTER BRYANT
Defendant: AARON A KIRKLAND, PATTON and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner: Dontay Lafon Armstrong
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Armstrong v. USA
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Khalil Rashad Armstrong
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Arazoza v. Shelly et al
as 9:2024cv00437
Plaintiff: Michelle Arazoza
Defendant: Tobias Shelly, Onondaga County, John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Armstrong v. Amy Shipley, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant: Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr. Dehner and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff: William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant: United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?