Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, East Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary et al
as 1:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary, Sheriffs Office, Atlanta Police Deptmt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrow v. Cordez et al
as 1:2022cv05952
Plaintiff:
Justin Farrow
Defendant:
C.O. Cordez, Sgt. (In Charge), O.R.C. Szczepanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Mercado et al
as 1:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Gabino Mercado, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, B. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavin Davis v. Rob Bonta
as 22-55000
Petitioner / Appellant:
GAVIN B. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
ROB BONTA
Davis v. Bonta
as 3:2021cv02042
Petitioner:
Gavin B. Davis
Respondent:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Grzeslo v. Fisher et al
as 1:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
Raythel Fisher, Jr., B. Davi, E. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Allen v. Dean et al
as 1:2021cv01150
Plaintiff:
James D. Allen and Llord J.P. Allen
Defendant:
Rashuan Q. Dean, Gracian, T. Plumlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Defendant:
Tyree L Carr, Christopher Brautzsch, Jeremy Nicodemus and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
