Cases 11 - 20 of 710
Eads v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Laquita Byrd and Marcus Byrd
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
