Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Grant-Davis v. Mikell et al
as 2:2019cv03119
Defendant:
Jason Mikell, Charleston, City of, Stephen Harris and others
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Walker County District Court et al
as 6:2019cv00617
Plaintiff:
Brian Darnell Casey, Sr
Defendant:
Sam Bently, Administrator Calloway, Walker County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Kiser et al
as 7:2018cv00319
Defendant:
Jane Doe, M. L. Counts, M. Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty et al v. Compass Group, TLC. et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Compass Group, TLC., Nelson Silva, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Cannon et al
as 4:2017cv02227
Petitioner:
Frank J. Washington
Respondent:
Al Cannon and Chief Bently
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Denise M Love, Denise Goodman and Wayne Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Wayne Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Denise M Love
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Denise Goodman
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, USA, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 7:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bently and Willie Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
