Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Ms. Strickland, Mr. Sprayberry and Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Leroy C. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donato v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv06894
Defendant:
Doctor Chung Lee, M.D., S. Michalek, Nurse Provider Jayso B. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
David Donato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2020cv04462
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. WRIGHT, IV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Penaloza v. Streeval et al
as 7:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Officer Brooks, Lieutenant Childers, C. Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Penaloza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lipusz v. Wright et al
as 3:2020cv00912
Defendant:
Colleen Gallahger and Johnny C. Wright
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Lipusz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Houston County et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv01043
Plaintiff:
Henry Madison, Labrandon D. Debose, Arthur R. Hooks and others
Defendant:
Major Raffany, Jefferson S. Dunn, Donald J. Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Houston County et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv01012
Defendant:
J. Trawick, Houston County Commissioners, Judge Derrick and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Houston County Commission for Courts and Jail Standards et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00909
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg, Chrisdeon Byrd, Carlos Blocker and others
Defendant:
Houston County Commissioners, K. Moore, Donald Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. BOLSTER
as 1:2019cv01122
Petitioner:
CHESTER C. WRIGHT
Respondent:
MARK BOLSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Fish et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Bruce, Fish, Lieutenant Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy C. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
