Cases 11 - 20 of 2,047
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODGERS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv06202
Plaintiff:
EVAN RODGERS
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Carroll
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Monti et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Christina Vineyard, Dr. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lovell Caldwell
Defendant:
Ryan, Mikat, Moriarty and others
Caldwell v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis Caldwell
Defendant:
John Hamm, Dr. Thomas, Scotty Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Caldwell v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
RAMON CALDWELL
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Alston v. Stuckey et al
as 0:2024cv02637
Plaintiff:
Londell Alston and Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Kitchen overseer Mrs. Vanadore, William Stuckey, Domernic Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
GOMEZ v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
HECTOR L. GOMEZ
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY, WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL and CUMBERLAND COUNTY INSURANCE COMMISSION, INSERVCO INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
