Cases 11 - 20 of 1,664
Ingram v. USA
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Cortez Ingram
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tolbert v. Marion County Medical
as 6:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cortez Tolbert
Defendant:
Marion County Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerrell Edwards v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6318
Petitioner:
JERRELL CORTEZ EDWARDS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
(HC) Harris v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Ernest Harris
Respondent:
C. Pfeifer, M. Melendrez and Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Andrews (Hayward) et al
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Warden Terry Andrews (Hayward), UTMB- Buluti, UTMB-Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simon Joaquin Vega v. B. Nava et al
as 2:2024cv02194
Plaintiff:
Simon Joaquin Vega
Defendant:
Correctional Officer B. Nava, Correctional Officer D. Landeros, Correctional Officer J. Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamie Santmyer v. Encarnacion Cortez, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SANTMYER
Defendant:
ENCARNACION CORTEZ, Sergeant and THOMAS J. DART
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Crowe
as 1:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Cortez D Williams
Respondent:
Crystal Crowe
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
