Cases 11 - 20 of 460
Charles Getz, Jr. v. State of Delaware Board of Parole, et al
as 23-3014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. GETZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE BOARD OF PAROLE, DAVID HENDERSON, JESSICA VOROUS and others
Sinek v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv04352
Petitioner:
Charles R. Sinek
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
COLEMAN v. CENTURION OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. COLEMAN, III
Defendant:
CENTURION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. First Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Deshunski D Burks
Defendant:
First Judicial District Court, Circuit Courts of Appeal, Louisiana State Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey Sutton v. Charles R. Holloman, PA
as 23-11859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORSEY SUTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES R. HOLLOMAN, PA
Crable v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2023cv00978
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Crable
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Officer Alford and Officer Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Suwannee County)
as 3:2023cv00557
Petitioner:
Charles R. Patterson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Charles R Oliver
Defendant:
Morgan Taylor, Kimberly Hvarre, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Holloman
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Dorsey W. Sutton
Defendant:
Charles R. Holloman, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bullen
as 7:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wade Davis
Defendant:
Charles R. Bullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
