Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Daniels v. Wayman et al
as 4:2019cv05256
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
Michael Wayman and Thomas L'Heureux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunner v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00750
Defendant:
C Okezie, Illinois Department of Corrections, Joe Shayne and others
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunner v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02901
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Estate of Dr. Saleh Obaisi, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Armor Correctional Health Inc et al
as 0:2017cv61910
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Roper
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Inc, Armor Medical Vendor and Karen Mizramy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coutu v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 1:2017cv10702
Petitioner:
David Daniel Coutu
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Valencia et al
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
J. Valencia, M. Owens, E. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Guy v. City of Killeen, Texas, et al
as 16-51433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN L. GUY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS, Texas Civil Service Commission, CHIEF DENNIS BALDWIN, Individual and Official Capacity, JONATHAN R. RINEHART, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Daniels v. Josephine County Jail
as 1:2016cv02273
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Defendant:
Josephine County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Rambosk
as 2:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Fuger
as 4:2014cv05112
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
Fuger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
