Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Williams v. Hallworth et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
Harold Williams
Defendant:
Rich Hallworth, Mrs. Copeland, Mr. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jacobson
as 1:2015cv05319
Petitioner:
Harold Williams
Respondent:
C. Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harold Melbie, Jr. v. United State
as 15-1725
Petitioner - Appellant:
Harold William Melbie, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Melbie v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00470
Petitioner:
Harold William Melbie, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Karras, Richard McCloskey, Christopher McClure and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Arnzen, III, et al v. Charles Palmer, et al
as 12-3634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John W. Arnzen, III, Harold Williams, Galen K. Shaffer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Director Charles Palmer, Jason Smith and Brad Wittrock
James Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 12-6541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HAROLD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, ANNIE SELLERS, CECILIA R. REYNOLDS and others
Williams v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
James Harold Williams
Defendant:
Cecilia R Reynolds, Tanya Huntley, Mark Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnzen v. Palmer et al---NO FURTHER PLEADINGS BY PRO SE PARTIES PURSUANT TO #5 and #22 IRO
as 5:2012cv04001
Plaintiff:
John W Arnzen, III , Harold Williams and Galen K Shaffer
Defendant:
Charles Palmer , Jason Smith and Brad Wittrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ozmint et al
as 4:2010cv02355
Plaintiff:
James Harold Williams
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Annie Mae Sellers, Cecilia R Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
