Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Susan Grund v. Julie Murphy, et al
as 17-3025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN GRUND
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE MURPHY, DAVID HINCHMAN, Doctor and CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Justice v. Hinchman
as 2:2017cv02369
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Justice, Jr.
Defendant:
Hinchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRYE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2017cv00042
Defendant:
DR. MICHAEL ALUKER, Dr. BRYAN BULLER, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KIRK FRYE
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Defendant:
CORIZON, DAVID HINCHMAN, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GRUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric L Porter v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2015cv05646
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Bleau, Bravo and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L Porter
Joseph Wood v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, THOMAS HARLAN, Capt. and others
Defendant:
NURSE, on Duty July 31, 2012 (P.M. Shift, Name unknown), TRISTEN TENNEY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES
Donovan L. Haley v. LASD et al
as 2:2014cv03944
Defendant:
Brown, Deputy Brown, Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Donovan L Haley
Los Angeles Sheriffs Department:
LASD
Wood v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wood
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Marvin C. Plumley, Thomas Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Versatile Supreme Allah v. LASD et al
as 2:2012cv06348
Plaintiff:
Versatile Supreme Allah
Defendant:
Leroy D Baca, Leroy D Baca, Hinchman and others
Eric Porter v. Los Angeles County, et al.
as 2:2011cv08244
Defendant:
Does, L A County Jail, Los Angeles County and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Porter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
