Cases 11 - 20 of 3,036
Hohn v. Bowen
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Hunter Bailey Hohn
Defendant:
Capt Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Derr et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Defendant:
A. Torres, L. Lazo, S. Keolanui and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher K.Y. Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bishop v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Travis Allan Bishop
Defendant:
Benjamin Hughes, Sabrina Hunter and Antonio Fuitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hunter v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv04652
Petitioner:
James Hunter, II
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lane v. McClean et al
as 0:2024cv03832
Defendant:
Unknown Pressley, Ashley Stukes, Unknown McClean and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ray v. Hunter et al
as 3:2024cv01437
Defendant:
Washington County, Oregon, Dr. Russell L. Marks, Multnomah County, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter, Jason v. State of Florida
as 2:2024cv14270
Defendant:
State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Jason Taravis Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hohn v. Lewyn et al
as 2:2024cv00851
Defendant:
Lt Lewyn, CO Sulliman, CO Bach and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Bailey Hohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes et al v. Advent Health Redmond et al
as 4:2024cv00180
Defendant:
Dustin Jones, George Hunter Myers, MD, Redmond Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Kerstein et al
as 4:2024cv00562
Defendant:
G Kerstein, Dextor Payne and E Bland
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
