Cases 11 - 20 of 358
Murphy v. Jackson Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01105
Plaintiff:
Danny Royce Murphy
Defendant:
Jackson Police Department, John R. Mehr, Tennessee Department Of Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Warden Walter West and Officer Whitington
Plaintiff:
Antoine Epps
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Schwarz v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2019cv03447
Defendant:
Charlie Schmitt, Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Edwin B Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forney v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00692
Plaintiff:
James M Forney, Michael R. Molina and J. Michael Forney
Defendant:
Shannon Jernigan, Mark Inch, Marshall Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davison v. Bunce et al
as 9:2019cv00653
Defendant:
R. Purlier, Rocque (Female), R. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tetlow v. Hogan et al
as 8:2019cv00356
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Stephen Moyer, Pat Goines-Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lynn Tetlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ysidro Hernandez v. J. Michael Lee et al
as 5:2018cv02120
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Hernandez
Defendant:
J. Michael Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelley v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv02229
Plaintiff:
Bronson Shelley
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling and J Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Schotimer et al
as 3:2018cv00518
Undetermined:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Mrs Bowman, Mr Stoll, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padron v. Stapleton
as 3:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Alfonso Padron
Defendant:
J Michael Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
