Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Silkey et al
as 2:2021cv00981
Plaintiff:
Frederict J Sanders
Defendant:
Justin Silkey, MPD Officer 1 John Doe, MPD Officer 2 John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Radtke
as 2:2021cv00229
Petitioner:
Malcolm J Sanders
Defendant:
Warden Dylan Radtke
Respondent:
Dylan Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Waddell v. Minton et al
as 3:2020cv01467
Defendant:
A. Minton, H. Riley, S. Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Waddell v. Minton et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Defendant:
A. Minton, D Haynes, S. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant:
A. Murphey, M. Lanier, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
George J. Sanders, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peppers v. Sanders et al
as 3:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robin DK Peppers and Robin Dale Kilgor Peppers
Defendant:
Mariana Gerolimatos, Jeffrey L Sanford and Thomas J Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Donyea Fowler
Defendant:
Indiana State of, South Bend Police Department, Jamil Elwaer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Core Civic, Correct Care Solution(s), R. Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Smith v. Officer J. Aita
as 17-6783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER J. AITA and THE CITY OF SALISBURY
Defendant:
SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PFC J. SANDER, #1122, PFC J. DIMARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
