Cases 11 - 20 of 67
KELLY v. TICE et al
as 2:2022cv03839
Petitioner:
JAMES KELLY
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, Jason Vinson, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. TDCJ-CID Director
as 5:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Jacob James Kelly
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. USA
as 4:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Prince Anthony James Kelly, Anthony James Kelly, Michael Parmel Holmes and others
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelly v. Caudillo et al
as 5:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Kelly
Defendant:
Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2021cv00333
Defendant:
John Hutton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Miree and others
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. State of Alabama DOC
as 7:2020cv01660
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC, Seargent Sealey, Colonel Woods and others
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolchuk et al v. Jackson et al
as 3:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Cameron Lee Ellis, Antoine Caldwell, Michelle Hardy and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Shapiro Wolchuk, Steven Donald Lemery, Joseph Nottingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hines et al
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Matt Hilliard, Daniel Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly et al v. Valdimir et al
as 1:2020cv00894
Defendant:
Unknown 2, Talley Valdimir, Unknown 1 and others
Plaintiff:
James Kelly and Kerry Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
