Cases 11 - 20 of 194
Brown III v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Louis James Brown III
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Rashane L. Jones
Defendant:
James Brown, R. Osteen, R. Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heather v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
Robert P Heather, Jr
Defendant:
James Brown, Brendon Kelly, Tracie Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden, FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv00225
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Fort Worth and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fitch v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray, Director Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00345
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Rodriguez v. Tsui et al
as 2:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Rodriguez
Defendant:
David Tsui, James Brown, Brian Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Petegrew et al
as 5:2022cv00483
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
FNU Petegrew and State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2022cv02362
Petitioner:
JAMES BROWN
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Walter Brown, II
as 22-6608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WALTER JAMES BROWN, II, a/k/a J Chill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
