Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Anderson v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv80828
Plaintiff:
Larry Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2014cv00319
Petitioner:
Larry Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 7:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Larry Anderson
Defendant:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Mayberry v. Larry Anderson, et al
as 12-11270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DWAYNE MAYBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY ANDERSON, Law Library Supervisor, GARY JOHNSON, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice in 1998, FRANK HOKE, Access to Court Supervisor and others
Marcus Mayberry v. Larry Anderson, et al
as 12-11121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DWAYNE MAYBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY ANDERSON, Law Library Supervisor, GARY JOHNSON, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice in 1998, FRANK HOKE, Access to Court Supervisor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mayberry v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dwayne Mayberry
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, Gary Johnson, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Bradford
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, Pritchett Towing Service, Randall Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Anderson et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2008cv00938
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jamaal Floyd
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, David Atwell and Cassandra Tillery
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Marvin Bailey
as 08-8101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVIN BAILEY, a/k/a Larry Anderson, a/k/a Head
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
