Cases 11 - 20 of 86
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv02801
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York and Malachi Z. York
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malachi Muhammad v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Malachi Hasan S. Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Jackson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Adam Jackson
Defendant:
Malachi Jackson and Grant Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Malachi et al
as 5:2022cv00490
Defendant:
FNU Malachi, Malaki, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buswell v. Cserep et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Malachi A. Buswell
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff David Cserep, Sgt. Jordan Baker, Sgt. Jarrod Ulric and others
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MCDANIEL v. ATTWOOD
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
MALACHI MCDANIEL
Defendant:
JAMES ATTWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Malachi Hasan S Muhammad
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scurry v. Gonzales
as 3:2022cv50052
Petitioner:
Malachi Scurry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Howard v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Malachi Howard
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Adam Lee, Devin Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malachi v. Lemon
as 5:2021ct03339
Plaintiff:
Mr. Terrance Malachi and Terrance Malachi
Defendant:
Mr. Terry J. Lemon and Terry J. Lemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
