Cases 11 - 20 of 41
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lanahan v. Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Division of Corrections, Clifton T Pirkins Hospital, Patuxent Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2016cv00828
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Division of Corrections and Martin O'Maley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. O'Maley et al
as 1:2015cv09559
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Thomas
Defendant:
Correction Officer O'Maley, Lieutenant Myers, Mr. Gusher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2015cv02369
Plaintiff:
Marc Maley
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Maley v. USA
as 14-5526
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MALEY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Loushonda Myers v. AT&T Corporation
as 13-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, CM, a minor child, AM, a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF AT&T CORPORATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Maley v. USA
as 2:2013cv07291
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Maley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Myers et al v. AT&T Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01432
Plaintiff:
Loushonda Myers, CM, AM and others
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation, Unknown agents of AT&T Corporation, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Errick Gilmore
Defendant:
USP McCreary, J.C. Holland, Maruka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
