Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Smith v. Precythe et al
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
James Ebert, Bonnie Boley, Ryan Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Givens v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00017
Defendant:
N. Largoza, Marcus Smith, Office of the Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batts, et al. v. Ditta, et al.
as 5:2018ct03060
Plaintiff:
Titus Lamont Batts, Erik Everett-El, Eddie L. Brooks-Bey and others
Defendant:
Michael Ditta, Betty Brown, FNU Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Waller et al
as 4:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Adrian Webster
Defendant:
Dennis Dolan Waller, E. Lewis, Marcus Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanier v. Ryan et al
as 1:2011cv22550
Plaintiff:
Gus Lanier
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, Barbara Jordan, Alina T. Hudak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. AR Dept. of Correction, et al
as 11-1084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, United States District Court, Saline County and others
Brooks v. Bufford et al
as 8:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Bevan Xavier Brooks
Defendant:
Curtis L Bufford, Michael Higgins, Timothy Lepet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Bufford et al
as 2:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Bevan Xavier Brooks
Defendant:
Curtis L Bufford , Michael Higgins , Timothy Lepet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Barnes v. George Dedmondt
as 10-6113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LEWIS BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE DEDMONDT, BRAIN WILLIAMS, SHADELL STEVENS and others
Defendant - None:
BRENDA B. CARPENTER and O-LEE STURKEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
