Cases 11 - 20 of 1,639
Donald E. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
Officer M. Welch, Officer Parra and Officer J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald L. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Booker
Defendant:
M. Welch, R. Parrg and J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher, Damian Anthony v. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv80321
Plaintiff:
Damian Anthony Fletcher
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, Broward Sheriff's Office, C. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina-Rivera v. USA
as 3:2024cv01121
Petitioner:
Sadid Medina-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina v. USA
as 6:2024cv06130
Petitioner:
Enrique Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. City of Durham et al
as 5:2024ct03041
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
City of Durham, Durham County Police Department, Angela Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Albert Medina
Respondent:
State of Nevada, James Scally and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Murphy, et al
as 24-1029
Plaintiff:
DELANO MEDINA
Defendant:
JENNIFER MURPHY, REBEKAH RYAN and JR HALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
