Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Gloria Gethier, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafael Ferguson v. S. Guerrero, et al
as 18-55309
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAFAEL FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. GUERRERO, D. TURNER, J. DIAZ and others
Ferguson v. Turner et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Defendant:
S Guerrero, D Turner, J. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickles v. USA
as 1:2017cv00505
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Letrenton Napoleon Nickles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Britto v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2017cv11956
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Britto
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health Care, LLC (MPCH), Geri Crisman-Rondeau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clenant Nickles v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, et al
as 17-30598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLENANT NICKLES
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, STEPHANIE LAMARTINERE, Warden of Medical, J. D. HELMS, Medical Doctor and others
Lopes v. Riendeau, et al
as 17-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA E. LOPES
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALDINE RIENDEAU, RN, BARBARA BERG, LPN, DYANA NICKL, Senior Director of Program UMass Correctional Health and others
Ferguson v. Villa et al
as 3:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Defendant:
M. Villa, G. Trujillo, H. Groth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Umass Correctional Health et al
as 1:2016cv12242
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson
Defendant:
Umass Correctional Health, Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health, A. Hameed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
