Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Johnson v. Shaw et al
as 1:2018cv06935
Defendant:
Officer McHugh, Officer Shaw, Officer Stoch and others
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00787
Defendant:
Glenn Goggins, Randall Houston, Officer Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yameen v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2018cv02405
Plaintiff:
Khalil Yameen
Defendant:
Sgt. Carpenter, Officer Ruiz, Officer Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Favor et al
as 9:2017cv02324
Plaintiff:
Derrick B Woods
Defendant:
Officer Favor, Officer Hunter and Officer Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Small v. Warden Willie L. Eagleton
as 17-6761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE SMALL
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Official Capacity, OFFICER BRADSHER and OFFICER SHAW, all sued in their individual capacity
Small v. Eagleton et al
as 2:2016cv02553
Plaintiff:
Clarence Small
Defendant:
Willie L Eagleton , Officer Bradsher and Officer Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Williams
Defendant:
Tyson Stephens, Officer Shaw and Faye Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Lowery et al
as 3:2012cv01102
Plaintiff:
Demetrius L. Allen
Defendant:
Brandon S. Lowery, Officer Shaw and Sgt. Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Whitten et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jarod Harris
Defendant:
Sgt. Whitten, Sgt. Evans, C.O. Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v Jefferson County, et al
as 3:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Craig
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Masinige, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
