Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrington v. Cruickshank et al
as 1:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
Tavares Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Cruickshank, Lieutenant M. Brown, Officer Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moss v. Salmon et al
as 7:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sgt. Draper, Officer Sparrow, Nurse Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Walley et al
as 8:2020cv00272
Defendant:
Officer Parcell, Officers Powers, Lt Walley and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Alex Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Byner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Officer Simmons, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Dionntez Byner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Henderson et al
as 3:2019cv00660
Plaintiff:
Sidney Harris
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Jeffery Dennison, Shawn Brasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturghill v. Shelby County Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02364
Defendant:
Officer Vance, SGT Boyd, T. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Sturghill, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Scheland, Nurse Rhonda and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2019ct03079
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Bittle, Officer Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2018ct03208
Defendant:
Officer Hawkins, Officer Boyles, Mr. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
