Cases 11 - 20 of 9,555
Wethington v. Parris et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wethington
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
YUN v. MINTON et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
ALEX YUN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MINTON, PHILLIPS, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
