Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Aaron Clark, IV v. S. Morgan, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MORGAN, assistant resident unit supervisor, T. WINN, Warden, T. HAINES, prisoner counselor and others
Aaron Clark v. S. Morgan, et al
as 15-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MORGAN, assistant resident unit supervisor, T. WINN, Warden, T. HAINES, prisoner counselor and others
Clark v. Morgan et al
as 2:2015cv10994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
S. Morgan, T. Winn, T. Haines and others
Wilson v. Mossbarger et al
as 3:2014cv00244
Petitioner:
Victor Keith Wilson
Respondent:
J. W. Mossbarger, J. Jackson, Jr., N. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas Jr. et al v. Cartwright et al
as 5:2013ct03112
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr., Thomas Gary, Maljah Ya'Sean Bey and others
Defendant:
Randy Cartwright, Felix C. Taylor, FNU Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Henley v. C. Miller, et al
as 13-1501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT HENLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MILLER, BLAINE LAFLER, Warden, C. BYNES and others
Galeas Jr. v. Harris et al
as 5:2013ct03064
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr.
Defendant:
Marsha Harris, R. Gilbert, Brian C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Cupp et al
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert H Johnson and Jeanette P Johnson
Defendant:
Robert E Cupp, Robin R Gilbert, Jeffrey Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cupp et al
as 2:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Robert Harold Johnson
Defendant:
Robert E Cupp, Matthew Roark, Robin R Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. DOE et al
as 2:2011cv00159
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CAPT. JOHN DOE and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
BRENT R. GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
