Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Allen v. Hutchison et al
as 2:2017cv02125
Plaintiff:
Carl Allen
Defendant:
Arica Hutchison, City of Memphis, S. H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Porter et al
as 2:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Max Ray Butler
Defendant:
S Porter, K Morgan, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Paulding County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Malichi Z. Bey
Defendant:
Paulding County Sheriff Office, D. Cochran, Stacey Folds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Abston v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 16-30315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. ABSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OAKDALE, C. MARIANO and others
Abston v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2015cv02386
Plaintiff:
David A Abston
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale, C Mariano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Milano
as 15-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MILANO, Captain, LT. M. JOSIAH, SGT. F. MENSAH and others
Defendant:
FOX and C. M. HILTON
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Hilliard et al
as 1:2015cv01396
Plaintiff:
David Scott Harrison
Defendant:
Karen Hilliard, S. H. Muhammad, Alex Lile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holz v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2014cv02352
Plaintiff:
Tim E. Holz
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Wayne County Court, S. H. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Milano
as 14-7668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MILANO, Captain, LT. M. JOSIAH, SGT. F. MENSAH and others
Defendant:
FOX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
