Cases 11 - 20 of 71
(PC) Brownlee v. Lee et al
as 1:2020cv00469
Defendant:
T. Purnell, B. Berneiser, J. Heister and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Justin Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gandy v. Turner et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom S. Lee, David Turner and Michael C. Moore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. The State Of Texas et al
as 2:2019cv00272
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Dr Glass Webcam Doe, Snack Pack Pudding & Jello Manufacture and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeff Poff v. John Schettle, et al
as 18-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF POFF
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN SCHETTLE, MAN S. LEE, AMANDA COLE and others
Brooks v. Lee et al
as 2:2018cv00374
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brooks
Defendant:
S. Lee and E. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Ragland v. S. Lee
as 16-7688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE RAGLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
S. LEE, Correctional Officer, JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, Warden and CHARLENE DAVIS, Asst. for Wendy Hobbs Regional Administrator
Cavato v. Lazarre et al
as 2:2016cv14115
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Cavato
Defendant:
W. Lazarre, S. Lee, Mel Limia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv00966
Petitioner:
Colette S. Lee
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cavato v. Henry et al
as 2:2016cv14067
Plaintiff:
Samuel B Cavato
Defendant:
Robert Henry, K. Rebele and S. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie Hill v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 16-1251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director (former), Arkansas Department of Correction, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Raymond Naylor, Internal Affairs Director/Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
