Cases 11 - 20 of 247
Hernandez et al v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Robert Hernandez and Toliver
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution and Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver et al v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Toliver and Roger P. Cote'
Defendant:
Semple and Osborn C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver et al v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Toliver and Joseph Mincewicz
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, A.W. Toliver, A.W. Dresson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Ann Toliver, Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Forshey
as 2:2023cv03143
Petitioner:
Dechaun Tolliver and Dechaun Toliver
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, A.W Toliver, A.W. Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz #214046 v. Saad et al
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Albert Munoz
Defendant:
Unknown Saad and Unknown Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
