Cases 11 - 20 of 1,186,082
Brown v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Larry Alvin Brown
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Schaefer et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
James A. Wright
Defendant:
Bill Schaefer and Jerry Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Quiring
as 3:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
J. Quiring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ainsworth v. Mazariegos et al
as 3:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Devonte Ainsworth
Defendant:
Eduardo Mazariegos, J. Maturino and J. Defranco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2024cv01427
Plaintiff:
Mario Sanchez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024at00410
Plaintiff:
Jasmyne M. Austin
Defendant:
R Rodriguez, V Ramolete, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
