Cases 21 - 30 of 15,676
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Whitman et al
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Brian A Patterson
Defendant:
Candace Whitman, Casey Kuehn, Amy Denneau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. CASALE et al
as 2:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEARS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE N. CASALE, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
