Cases 21 - 30 of 631
Albert Stafford v. Dr. G. Rosario
as 23-12270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT STAFFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
G. ROSARIO
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. CORPORAL H. SOLIS et al
as 2:2023cv03687
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROASARIO-SANCHEZ and ANGEL ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CORPORAL H. SOLIS and DR. IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario Carrasquillo v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv05121
Petitioner:
Pedro Rosario Carrasquillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROSARIO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCADO ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
LUIS MERCADO ROSARIO
Defendant:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MERCADO ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 3:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and COLLETE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Nelson v. Rosario
as 2:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
James D. Nelson
Defendant:
T. Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
