Cases 21 - 30 of 2,010
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins, Screven County Prison and Steven Scroggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility, et al
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., R.C. SMITH, former Warden, L.C.C.F. and others
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damien Ford v. J. Lee, et al
as 24-1441
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Defendant:
J. Lee, Sergeant, Sims, Sergeant, Tucker Max Unit, Taylor, Correctional Officer and others
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Auguste v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jean R. Auguste, Jr.
Defendant:
Deparatment of Corrections, Devon M. Radlin, Ilissa Brownstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Sweet
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Shaynna Lauren Sims
Respondent:
Christe Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sims v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Danny J. Sims
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
