Cases 21 - 30 of 474
Andrew Valles v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-55445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF UTAH
Andrew Valles v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-55441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF UTAH
Valle v. Tucson City Court et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Michael X Valle
Respondent:
Tucson City Court and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valles v. Attorney General, et al
as 23-4066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Valle v. Medical Director et al
as 9:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Martin F. Valle
Defendant:
Medical Director and Pam Lychner State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE v. VALLE
as 2:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
EUGENE LEE
Defendant:
ANDREW VALLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Del Valle v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00439
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Ruiz-Del Valle
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Ayala v. Astorga et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Armando B. Ayala
Defendant:
A. Astorga, A. Valle and B. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
