Cases 21 - 30 of 42
BOATRIGHT v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00773
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BOATRIGHT
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Puckett v. Chrysler et al
as 2:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Defendant:
J. Chrysler, J. Harbour, B. Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Defazio et al
as 2:2016cv02750
Plaintiff:
Theon Owens
Defendant:
Joseph Defazio, Jacob Burke, Matthew Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatright v. Kiser et al
as 2:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Earl Matthew Boatright
Defendant:
J. Kiser, R. Clary, Shawn K. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00308
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDENS, BOATRIGHT, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
COREY BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nolan Boatright v. Warden
as 15-14450
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOLAN CECIL BOATRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Owens v. DeFazio et al
as 2:2015cv01570
Plaintiff:
Theon Owens
Defendant:
J. DeFazio, M. Brady, J. Lebeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURY v. DANIALS et al
as 2:2015cv00217
Defendant:
BOATRIGHT, CHARLES A. DANIALS, D. EZEKIEL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan Boatright v. Warden
as 15-13177
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOLAN CECIL BOATRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Bruce Rogers v. Shawna Boatright, et al
as 15-20354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE A. ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWNA TALBOT BOATRIGHT, Supervisor, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institution Division, JOSE L. GARCIA, JR., Transportation Driver, Security, HERBERT J. GARCIA, Transportation Driver, Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
