Cases 21 - 30 of 2,170
Quordalis Sanders v. William Griesbach, et al
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, VICTORIA VAN-BURNS, P.A. KROOL and others
Childers v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Childers
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Willcetson et al
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
T. Willcetson, A. Blinken, A Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamar Travillion v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1763
Plaintiff:
JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, in his official capacity as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Secretary of Corrections, OFFICER STOVER, in his individual capacity, OFFICER LOSE, in his individual capacity and others
May #929149 v. Minnick et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Damian Michael May #929149
Defendant:
Emily A. Minnick, Unknown Smolenski, Carolyn Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Defendant:
Galloway, Hughes and Il Dept Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Burns v. Sheck et al
as 1:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Olivia Sheck, Nurse Mitchell, Dr. Laura Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Patrick A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
