Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Kaczmarek v. USA
as 1:2022cv13152
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Kaczmarek
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC)Butler v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Butler
Defendant:
David Robinson, C. Thomas, Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland
as 3:2022cv06550
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Nelson
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seckington v. Dixion et al
as 6:2022cv01590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Seckington
Defendant:
Ricky Dixion, Ashley Moody and Debra S. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron, Christopher v. Doe, John et al
as 3:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Barron
Defendant:
John Doe, Dr. John Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2 and others
Not Classified By Court:
OSCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClaire v. Dyer et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael LeClaire
Defendant:
Deputy Richard Dyer and Deputy Brandon Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. USA
as 6:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Whitaker, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marx v. Nanos et al
as 4:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marx
Defendant:
Christopher Nanos, NaphCare, Pima County Jail Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Williams v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3607
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
