Cases 21 - 30 of 367
Crank v. Collier
as 6:2019cv00228
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Petitioner:
Charles Samuel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLERVRAIN v. SAMUEL et al
as 1:2019cv00468
Defendant:
SEAN R O'NEIL, IAN CONNORS, MATT HUREL and others
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Gwathey M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv02786
Defendant:
Nolte Rachelle, M.D., Mr. Charles Samuels, Jr., Williams Lewis, II and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. King et al
as 4:2018cv04113
Defendant:
Officer Emanuel Rodriguez, Corporal Nathan Tefft, Officer A. Landreth and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv03039
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clervrain v. Samuel et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Charles Samuel, Jr, Ian Connors, Christopher Erlewine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv03143
Plaintiff:
Casey Eden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Paul M. Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy Tucker v. Loretta Lynch
as 17-7392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY JAMES TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, HARRY W. ATKINSON, Complex Warden and others
Percy Tucker v. Loretta Lynch
as 17-7393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY JAMES TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, HARRY W. ATKINSON, Complex Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
