Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Frederick Banks v. Secretary Interior
as 14-1213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Andreakos v. Department of Interior of the United States et al
as 8:2013cv03098
Plaintiff:
Earl Stelios Andreakos
Defendant:
Department of Interior of the United States, USA and Executive Branch of United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frederick Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 12-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Commissioner and Director, Department of Interior, Secretary, Eric Holder, Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
