Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Jones v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Jones and George Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Commissioner, Chairman Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Core Civic of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02675
Defendant:
Core Civic of America, Inc., CEO Damon T. Hininger, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dwan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rust v. Hininger et al
as 3:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Gregory C. Dozier, Dr. Yvonne Neau and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Shane Rust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Lewis et al
as 6:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Warden Robert J. Adams, Dr. Marler and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin R. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Hininger
as 3:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jacoby G Fields and Jacoby Germaine Fields
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fields v. Hininger
as 5:2019cv01632
Plaintiff:
Jacoby G Fields and Jacoby Germaine Fields
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillette v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Gillette
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger and Tallahatchie County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rust v. Hininger et al
as 3:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward Shane Rust
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Gregory C. Dozier, Yvonne Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Maisano v. Core Civic, et al
as 17-16417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE FRANK MAISANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CORE CIVIC, SEON JEONG KIM, doctor, D.D.S., official and individual capacity, MATTHEW A. MUSSON, health services administrator, official and individual capacity and others
Maisano v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Seon Jeong Kim , Matthew Musson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
