Cases 21 - 30 of 9,786
FARLEY v. DOBBS et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
BRYAN DOBBS, KATHY GOEN, LEAH ARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis and Christopher Ahlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
ALLEN, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Dominic A. Lowe, Eyan A. Moore and Pedro Marcelino
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, J. Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Dennis Thompson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
