Cases 21 - 30 of 672
Dunbar Jr. v. Stonebreaker
as 9:2023cv05323
Petitioner:
Joseph Wadell Dunbar Jr.
Respondent:
Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Murphy Dunbar v. L.A. Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv09495
Plaintiff:
Kevin Murphy Dunbar, Sr.
Defendant:
L.A. Police Department, Chief of Police, David Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINHO v. CURRY et al
as 3:2023cv22430
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTINHO
Defendant:
JUDGE MATTHEW CURRY and PROSECUTOR STEVEN DUNBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. R.S. Dunbar, Warden
as 0:2023cv04464
Petitioner:
Dwonne Washington
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dunbar v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00908
Petitioner:
Naaron Dunbar
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. USA
as 1:2023cv01697
Petitioner:
Lawrence Dunbar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dunbar v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Naaron Dunbar
Defendant:
DOCCS, R. Zehr, Unknown DOCCS Liable Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullins v. Dunbar et al
as 0:2023cv02328
Petitioner:
Demetrius Pullins
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar and FCI-Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roe v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04129
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Jay Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiers v. Roberts et al
as 5:2023cv02203
Plaintiff:
Sharee L Hiers
Defendant:
Anthony Roberts, Matthew Crosby, Marquions Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
