Cases 21 - 30 of 2,047
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brodeur v. USA Government
as 1:2024cv11803
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
USA Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Szewc, et al
as 24-3095
Defendant:
LILY SZEWC, UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, MARK DUPREE and others
Plaintiff:
KODI LEE TAYLOR
Walton v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County et al
as 5:2024cv03115
Defendant:
John Doe, Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Ramar Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Randall County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00160
Defendant:
Marshalls, Federal Government and Randall County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Curtis Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodeur v. Government
as 3:2024cv01140
Respondent:
Government
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BRAYBOY v. GOVERNMENT OFFICE
as 2:2024cv02843
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Washington et al
as 5:2024cv00722
Defendant:
Erika Washington, Alabama, State of, Ebony C. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Potter County et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, Potter County Police Department and Potter County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
