Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Dulaney #873009 v. Arrendondo et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dulaney #873009
Defendant:
Iris Arrendondo, Aaron Shattuck, Anthony Demorest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Doe, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, FNU Dye, Richard Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Torres et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lagene C McGhee
Defendant:
Iris N Torres, Julie Capraro, Andrea Popp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
IRIS GARCIA
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO, MARIANNA PRISON CAMP and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv05673
Defendant:
Iris Harmanson, Marcus Myers, R L C C Medical Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ottomanelli v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv02983
Plaintiff:
Robert A Ottomanelli
Defendant:
Iris Martinez, Britni Huddleston, Cook County Clerk of the Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Williams
as 22-50233
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Iry Williams, also known as Iry James Williams
Williams v. Peykoff et al
as 4:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Iry James Williams
Defendant:
Andrew Peykos, Sr, Andrew Peykos, II, Andrew Peykoff, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 7:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Iry James Williams
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
