Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Adams v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05286
Plaintiff:
James V Adams
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Mary L Byrd, Ray Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sparks, et al.
as 1:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
James Lee Adams
Defendant:
J. Sparks, Brewer, Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roach v. Cowin et al
as 9:2011cv00660
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Roach
Defendant:
Timothy H. Cowin, K. VornDran, Rosemary Auber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony DeLoach v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY DELOACH
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. BROWN, JAMES E. ELLISON, JAMES R. ODOM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLES CONDON, SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LEGISLATURE and others
ADAMS v. CULPEPPER
as 3:2009cv00214
Petitioner:
JAMES D ADAMS
Respondent:
S CULPEPPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. BERKS COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2009cv00053
Petitioner:
BOOKER LEON CARTER
Respondent:
BERKS COUNTY PRISON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JAMES T. ADAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timothy Dotson v. N. Lane, Jr., et al
as 08-4384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY D. DOTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
N. EDWARD LANE, JR., KEVIN RINGS and JAMES W. ADAMS
Adams v. Merced County et al
as 2:2008cv02391
Plaintiff:
James Richard Adams
Defendant:
Merced County, Mark Pazin, Merced County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
