Cases 21 - 30 of 458
BENDYNA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
JAMES H BENDYNA
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
US v. James Roane, Jr.
as 23-1
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES H. ROANE, JR., a/k/a J.R.
Truslow v. Hutchenson, et al
as 7:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
James H. Truslow, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan F. Hutchenson, Corey Madison, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv07208
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Breon Peace, James H. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PROCTOR v. DIALESANDRO et al
as 2:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor
Defendant:
MARK DIALESANDRO, John Stabiel, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. Dialesandro et al
as 1:2022cv05470
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor
Defendant:
Mark Dialesandro, John Stabiel, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Jordan v. James Coffman, et al
as 22-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald K. Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
James H. Coffman, Steve Martin, Anne L. Precythe and others
Dillingham v. Brown-Williams et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
James H. Dillingham, III
Defendant:
Tammy Brown-Williams, Harold Clarke, Cynthia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Chen
as 4:2022cv03243
Plaintiff:
Marcus Price
Defendant:
Dr. James H. Chen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
