Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Hamilton v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Hamilton
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Donald Stapley, Andrew Kunasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy James Figueroa v. David Baughman
as 2:2017cv02032
Respondent:
David Baughman
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Figueroa
Jeremy Hendricks v. Matt Bingham, et al
as 17-40144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY JAMES HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT BINGHAM and PETER KEIM
Jeremy James Godwin v. David Davey
as 2:2016cv07928
Respondent:
David Davey
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Godwin
Jeremy James Godwin v. David Davey
as 5:2016cv02234
Respondent:
David Davey
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Godwin
Benjamin Leibelson v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 16-2215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BENJAMIN LEIBELSON
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, LOUIS C. EICHENLAUB, individually and as Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, JOHN F. CARAWAY, individually and as Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Defendant:
EDWIN K. CAULEY, individually and as Warden, FCI McDowell, WV, JOHN DOES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Officers, FCI Beckley, WV, JOHN ROES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Administrative, Director of Management Personnel, FCI Beckley, Wv and others
Wimberly v. Englade et al
as 1:2016cv00418
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Wimberly
Defendant:
Michelle Englade, Robert Strause, Tracy Sorge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wimberly v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00277
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Wimberly
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hendricks v. Bingham et al
as 6:2016cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Hendricks
Defendant:
Matt Bingham and Peter Keim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimberly v. USA
as 1:2016cv00204
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Wimberly
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
