Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Sawyer v. Baker et al
as 3:2016cv00627
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Baker
Petitioner:
Airell Joshua Thomas Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01476
Petitioner:
Joshua Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean, et al
as 14-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG MCKEAN, Pennsylvania State Police and JOSHUA THOMAS, Pennsylvania State Police
Alwinger v. Taylor
as 2:2014cv01218
Petitioner:
Joshua Thomas Alwinger
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasa v. DeGrange et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Vasa
Defendant:
Dave DeGrange, Coleen Kascel and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Townsend
as 4:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Earl Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean, et al
as 12-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG MCKEAN, Pennsylvania State Police and JOSHUA THOMAS, Pennsylvania State Police
MALCOMB v. MCKEAN et al
as 2:2011cv01087
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant:
CRAIG MCKEAN and JOSHUA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Management East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Earl Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Management, GEO, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burns et al
as 4:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Earl Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Terry L. Burns and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
