Cases 21 - 30 of 244
Watkins v. Eckstrom, et al.
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Deputy J. Eckstrom and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, Robert B Norris and Brett A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnette v. Miller et al
as 7:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Burnette
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Lt. Hall, Major O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lee Stinchcomb v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2022cv05024
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Stinchcomb
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nickoson v. Trent et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Nickoson
Defendant:
George Trent, Rachael Baumgardner, Alan Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Mosley et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
James B. Shaw, Kenneth Lee Hall, Timothy Mallard and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Chuck Mosley, Mat Spell and Nurse Shaila Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lee Armbruster v. D. Samual et al
as 2:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Armbruster
Defendant:
D. Samual, California Mens Colony State Prison and Colter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Sean Johnson, Assistant Warden Mallissa Kimberley, Stephanie Lanham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
US v. Kenneth Brown
as 22-6160
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH LEE BROWN
Brown v. USA
as 7:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.